Talk:Burden of Proof
Duplicate Article
This page is a duplicate of The Burden of Proof and should probably be deleted. Eddie 17:25, 9 October 2009 (CDT)
- Thing to do is set up a redirect. take one page and put #REDIRECT pagename
- I agree. If there is no objection from the community in the next couple of days I will impliment the redirect if no-one else has done so in the interim. ;) Eddie 23:57, 9 October 2009 (CDT)
nah, go for it.. I'd redirect The Burden of Proof to Burden of Proof - you can just move the page if you have access and that does an automatic redirect. In fact, let me see if I can do it.--Pile 00:52, 10 October 2009 (CDT)
- Thanks for taking care of that. When you've read this note please go ahead and delete this section since it is no longer relevant. :) Eddie 09:58, 10 October 2009 (CDT)
Split this article?
I recomend this article be split up into multiple articles. For example, although the concept of "Proving A Negative" is related to burden of proof, it isn't specifically part of the definition of "Burden of Proof" and warrants its own article. If there are no objections by tomorrow sometime then I will go ahead and do it. Eddie 09:58, 10 October 2009 (CDT)
This site costs a lot of money in bandwidth and resources. We are glad to bring it to you free, but would you consider helping support our site by making a donation? Any amount would go a long way towards helping us continue to provide this useful service to the community.
Click on the Paypal button below to donate. Your support is most appreciated! |
---|