Would you like to add or edit content here? Here's how you can have an account!



Search results

From FreeThoughtPedia
Jump to: navigation, search

  • Common Theist Arguments
    ...arguments. These will be broken down into categories based on whether the arguments are general in nature (i.e. applying to a generic "god") or against specifi Looking for a quick summary? Take a look at the [[Top ten arguments for the existence of God]].
    9 KB (1,438 words) - 02:03, 24 November 2010
  • Argument from Design
    Back: [[Common Theist Arguments]] ...ng about and cannot explain how such concepts work. They take snippets of scientific theory out of context and try to shoehorn them into their preconceived noti
    7 KB (1,162 words) - 14:17, 1 November 2010
  • Theological Criticisms
    == Philosophical Arguments == * [[Top 10 arguments for the existence of God]] - A comprehensive outline of the most common cla
    12 KB (1,963 words) - 20:48, 24 June 2011
  • The Bible and Science
    ...ny statements that are ahead of their time. The Bible supposedly has great scientific wisdom and only now are we beginning to realize as much. ...e more than enough statements contained therein to forestall any claims to scientific precision. Indeed, many statements clearly belong in the realm of mythology
    12 KB (2,005 words) - 17:12, 18 December 2010
  • Inconsistencies in the Bible
    # We are told the Bible has no scientific errors, yet it says the bat is a bird (Lev. 11:13,19), hares chew the cud ( * [[Theological Criticisms#Arguments Against Scripture|Arguments against scripture]]
    13 KB (2,308 words) - 20:11, 31 January 2011
  • To Live at All is a Miracle
    [[Category:Philosophical arguments]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    11 KB (1,950 words) - 02:28, 28 January 2008
  • Intelligent design
    There are many simple arguments that are to often dismissed by believers in Intelligent Design, the most co [[Category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (292 words) - 23:27, 29 May 2009
  • Creationism/Intelligent Design
    ...llusion, caused by omission, which virtually guarantees that alone, either scientific theory or religious doctrine can only be half-right in their understanding Theist arguments:
    7 KB (1,094 words) - 20:37, 10 April 2009
  • Religious Debate
    ...estival on the persistence of religious belief in a world of unprecedented scientific and technological advancement. * [[Arguments Against Existence Of God]] Some arguments against the existence of God that are very effective on religious minds.
    3 KB (491 words) - 21:16, 10 March 2010
  • What Is The Soul?
    [[Category:Scientific arguments]] [[Category:Philosophical arguments]]
    4 KB (644 words) - 16:43, 11 October 2009
  • Science
    ...ist beliefs. The fundamentalists are potentially at a disadvantage as the scientific method is the best method known to find out the truth. Therefore fundamentalists tend to rely on lies, distortions and emotional arguments.
    3 KB (397 words) - 14:25, 3 July 2011
  • Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
    ...ternberg, claim that questioning Darwinism led to their expulsion from the scientific fold (the film relies extensively on the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy ...nd godlessness. Blithely ignoring the vital distinction between social and scientific Darwinism, the film links evolution theory to fascism (as well as abortion,
    67 KB (11,144 words) - 18:37, 2 January 2010
  • Logical Fallacies by Todangst
    ...rhetoric (appeals to emotion) or another form of faulty logic. While these arguments also possess a particular form, ''one cannot tell from the form alone'' tha ...ional beliefs. In other words, learning logic won't only help you win some arguments, but it may help you to live a healthier life in general! Cognitive and REB
    113 KB (19,125 words) - 15:47, 22 February 2012
  • The So Called "Problem" Of Induction
    ... Inductive Logic|deductive logic]] in that the premises we feed into these arguments are not categories or definitions or equalities, but observations of the re ... high probabilities, but not certitudes. It is one of the strengths of the scientific method as it acknowledges a chance of error(while maintaining rigorous stan
    25 KB (4,209 words) - 16:56, 10 March 2008
  • Where are the unicorns?
    * [[Theological Criticisms#Arguments Against Scripture|Arguments against scripture]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    1 KB (180 words) - 05:28, 29 October 2008
  • A Great World Wide Flood
    [[category:Theological arguments]] [[category:scriptural arguments]]
    7 KB (1,187 words) - 14:24, 3 July 2011
  • Example argument page
    Back: [[Common Theist Arguments]] ... book of fiction. Its been proven wrong by scientific evidence. When I say scientific evidence, I mean real, logical evidence involving studies and test, rather
    6 KB (959 words) - 14:50, 13 December 2011
  • Evolution vs. Creation
    ...ence to support this claim. It cannot be called a "theory" by traditional scientific standards because a theory requires some form of tests or validation proces ...at it only makes sense if homosexuality is in fact a genetic trait. (A now scientific fact but one that was widely refused by theists before) Second, point out t
    9 KB (1,451 words) - 21:41, 11 June 2010
  • Peppered Moth
    In a seminal description of his results to a scientific conference this week in Sweden, Professor Majerus gave a resounding vote of [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    7 KB (1,095 words) - 20:17, 26 July 2011
  • Lucy
    [[Category:Theological arguments]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (646 words) - 19:53, 31 August 2007
  • Missing missing links
    ... is. When all the evidence is carefully and thoroughly studied by the best scientific methods, it turns out that these fossils were either from monkeys, apes, or ...on as "intellectual fraud" because it is a religious world view cloaked in scientific terminology.
    4 KB (672 words) - 13:07, 3 June 2008
  • Percentage of atheists
    ...any innocent readers the impression that scientists in droves were finding scientific "evidence" allowing for God and an afterlife and were jumping on the religi [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    18 KB (2,481 words) - 17:12, 9 February 2009
  • 20 Reasons to abandon Christianity
    ...ty runs in Christianity can be gauged by one of the most popular Christian arguments for belief in God: Pascal’s wager. This "wager" holds that it’s safer t ===8. Christianity is anti-intellectual, anti-scientific.===
    52 KB (8,484 words) - 02:00, 24 November 2010
  • Quotes
    ...cience, for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot. But I am convinced that such b ...ns for the role of God in the affairs of the universe. With the success of scientific theories in describing events, most people have come to believe that God al
    37 KB (6,424 words) - 01:55, 24 November 2010
  • Free will
    ... Christian notion of "free will". Let's now examine free will from a more scientific/philosophical perspective. I am doing this because I think there's a stron There is overwhelming scientific evidence of non-chance, non-arbitrary decision making in human brains. We
    16 KB (2,788 words) - 01:32, 12 March 2011
  • Evidence of moral, rational activity in animals
    [[Category:scientific arguments]] [[Category:theological arguments]]
    4 KB (605 words) - 18:05, 9 September 2007
  • Our godless Constitution
    ... to take his own pulse, the consummate gesture of a creature of the age of scientific rationalism. [[Category:historical arguments]]
    17 KB (2,939 words) - 11:31, 8 August 2008
  • Why are atheists so angry?
    [[Category:theological arguments]] ..., because science disproves their parents' religion - leading to appalling scientific illiteracy.
    13 KB (2,096 words) - 23:17, 14 June 2009
  • Deconversion stories
    ...ments being presented. I would often scoff at Mithra and Krishna and Horus arguments. Most atheists seemed to push them as direct corollaries when they definite [[Category:theological arguments]]
    10 KB (1,755 words) - 23:57, 23 June 2009
  • Disproving god via arguement of the infinite
    ...culation about the nature of things outside the universe, with no room for scientific verification. Attempting to explain something outside this universe with th [[Category:theological arguments]]
    2 KB (413 words) - 08:50, 25 April 2009
  • Engaging Creationists
    ...iable "alternative" to existing theories that have held up to centuries of scientific scrutiny, but instead because of an implication that these faith-based idea A good scientific backdrop to the discussion might be Dr. Meyer's book that comes out in June
    10 KB (1,719 words) - 21:41, 19 December 2010
  • Deconversion
    ...sion is the term atheists use to describe the self-discovery of natural or scientific thinking about the nature of the universe. For most people, the process is [[category:theological arguments]]
    1 KB (154 words) - 18:20, 20 March 2008
  • Why I Am Not A Christian
    ...ved by the unaided reason and they had to set up what they considered were arguments to prove it. ...ange their character as time goes on. They were at first hard intellectual arguments embodying certain quite definite fallacies. As we come to modern times they
    34 KB (6,550 words) - 05:23, 21 December 2010
  • Jesus and Mithra
    : by David Ulansey, originally published in Scientific American, December 1989 (vol. 261, #6), pp. 130-135. [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    35 KB (5,728 words) - 21:25, 7 February 2011
  • The dragon in my garage
    [[Category:Scientific arguments]] [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    5 KB (835 words) - 03:10, 19 July 2010
  • Carl Sagan
    ...f more than 20 books. In his works, he advocated skeptical inquiry and the scientific method. He pioneered exobiology and promoted the Search for Extra-Terrestri [[category:scientific arguments|Sagan]]
    1 KB (166 words) - 04:17, 29 December 2010
  • The root of all evil?
    [[Category:Theological arguments]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    974 B (122 words) - 05:44, 4 January 2009
  • Evolution
    If evolution is not a fact or a theory, then what is it? Based on the scientific method it qualifies as a model or a hypothesis.}} [[Category:scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (538 words) - 19:09, 8 December 2010
  • Evolution and sex
    [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (604 words) - 17:39, 9 September 2008
  • The Improbability of God
    ...-destroying missionaries, legally enforced resistance to each new piece of scientific truth until the last possible moment -- are even more impressive. And what ...has been destroyed as a reason for believing in a God. Are there any other arguments? Some people believe in God because of what appears to them to be an inner
    18 KB (3,253 words) - 19:10, 30 March 2008
  • What the bleep do we know?
    [[What the bleep do we know?]] claims to offer new insight and so-called scientific discoveries of other dimensions and a new take on what we call reality. ...consider the film to be grossly inaccurate and riddled with new-age pseudo-scientific propaganda. Many of the scientists who participated in interviews for the
    25 KB (4,300 words) - 03:09, 12 August 2008
  • Enemies of Reason
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (252 words) - 18:42, 17 February 2009
  • Richard Dawkins on Alan Colmes' show
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    1 KB (191 words) - 16:03, 12 November 2007
  • About
    ...entral repository of philosophical, scientific, scriptural, and historical arguments and commentary on the [[Freethought]] movement. Our goal is to provide a r
    3 KB (514 words) - 22:50, 2 January 2008
  • Dan Barker vs. Jason Gastrich
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scriptural arguments]]
    1 KB (177 words) - 11:26, 17 August 2011
  • Believers are no better
    [[category:historical arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (572 words) - 19:50, 10 December 2008
  • God of the gaps
    ...ler. This also explains why many theologies seek to repress and discredit scientific advancement. [[category:theological arguments]]
    1 KB (213 words) - 15:03, 3 July 2011
  • Albert Einstein
    ...is blind" -- have been the subject of much debate, used notably to back up arguments in favour of faith. Through the reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible c
    11 KB (1,840 words) - 16:40, 18 May 2008
  • Judgement Day - Intelligent Design on Trial
    ...le accounts for all observed facts about nature. (See Defining Science and arguments for and against evolution.) ...ions are normal research problems—the type that arise in any flourishing scientific field.
    4 KB (616 words) - 16:25, 17 November 2008
  • God does exist
    ...se which overruled previous conclusions. But as science has progressed, no scientific discovery has countered the numerical likelihood of an intelligent mind bei [[category:theological arguments]]
    16 KB (2,793 words) - 14:51, 13 December 2011
  • Judgement Day - Intelligent Design on Trial transcript
    And advocates contend, intelligent design is a bold, new scientific theory with the power to overthrow the theory of evolution. PHILLIP JOHNSON (UC Berkeley): If ev— evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine then the critique of that doctrine is a legitimate part of science
    98 KB (16,725 words) - 06:58, 24 November 2007
  • Monsters in the Bible
    * [[Theological Criticisms#Arguments Against Scripture|Arguments against scripture]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    10 KB (1,688 words) - 07:39, 1 February 2010
  • Straw Man
    ::Strawman arguments often [[One-dimensional thinking|paint the world in black and white]], also ...often grossly inaccurate. These types of cases make for perfect straw man arguments (assuming people do not do their own investigating to realize the networks
    11 KB (1,757 words) - 20:53, 24 April 2010
  • Shroud of Turin
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:historical arguments]]
    3 KB (523 words) - 15:43, 22 February 2012
  • Transitional fossils
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    812 B (118 words) - 23:35, 7 December 2007
  • The fact of evolution
    ...y all the evidence but evolution via descent with modification is the only scientific model that exists. *[[Gallery of Scientific Images]]
    14 KB (2,301 words) - 02:03, 24 November 2010
  • Creation of new species
    [[Category:scientific arguments]]
    1 KB (167 words) - 23:42, 14 December 2007
  • Christmas
    [[category:historical arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    11 KB (1,748 words) - 14:26, 15 December 2011
  • Was Behemoth a Dinosaur?
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scriptural arguments]]
    19 KB (3,285 words) - 14:01, 6 June 2010
  • The Sacrifice of Reason
    And it is astride this contemptible history of religious atrocity and scientific ignorance that Christianity now stands as an absurdly unselfconscious apoth [[category:theological arguments]]
    8 KB (1,323 words) - 16:25, 20 December 2007
  • Laws and other rules against atheists and agnostics
    ...lieve that a particular religion has no merit; that it is founded on a pre-scientific worldview, and that the application of many of its tenets is contrary to in [[category:theological arguments]]
    12 KB (1,886 words) - 02:00, 24 November 2010
  • When creationists attack
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    3 KB (439 words) - 02:46, 15 April 2008
  • Top ten arguments for the existence of God
    ...t. They used one of the ten arguments listed herein. How solid are these arguments and how do they stand up to basic science and reason? ...or invoking bits and pieces of "Quantum Theory" but they're still the same arguments). How familiar are you with these?
    23 KB (3,822 words) - 19:18, 4 April 2011
  • 1=0
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    977 B (131 words) - 14:45, 3 July 2011
  • Why atheists are morally superior
    ...s to pray instead of seeking medical attention. We believe in all kinds of scientific research and medicine. We even believe in stem cell research. Most of us al [[category:theological arguments]]
    3 KB (501 words) - 20:48, 25 May 2009
  • IDiot
    ...e]] does not appear to have any contradictions with reality and recognized scientific facts. [[category:scientific arguments]]
    560 B (72 words) - 17:49, 8 April 2008
  • Why atheism?
    ==History and Development of Science and Scientific Naturalism== ...eligion took control and Aristotle was revered as the source of supposedly scientific knowledge.
    107 KB (18,243 words) - 03:55, 14 April 2009
  • Top Ten Erroneous Christian Claims
    * [[Top ten arguments for the existence of God]] ...d is in this world, then we can apply science to your claim and come to a "scientific conclusion". If you don't like the conclusion, that's your problem. You d
    4 KB (612 words) - 21:41, 19 December 2010
  • Funny theist quotes
    ...' ---- In fact, technology is not in any way related to the web of idiotic scientific theory. ALL inventors have been anti-science. The Wright brothers said: "Sc ...opposite of science. Biblical wisdom NEVER CHANGES, and anyone can get it. Scientific wisdom is always changing and contradicting itself, and really nobody gets
    64 KB (11,277 words) - 17:24, 2 April 2008
  • The Cosmological Argument
    Not many good arguments have been raised against this one, most tend towards saying that scientists [[category:Arguments|Cosmological]]
    3 KB (448 words) - 15:44, 2 October 2011
  • Gallery of Statistical Images
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:historical arguments]]
    3 KB (481 words) - 14:06, 19 September 2012
  • Freethinker slogans
    ...ansas and All I Got Was This Lousy T-shirt and a Poor Understanding of the Scientific Method. [[category:theological arguments]]
    7 KB (1,194 words) - 02:59, 10 August 2012
  • Young earth creationism
    .... The overwhelming scientific consensus is that creationist claims have no scientific validity. The Earth is actually about age of about 4.5 billion years calcul The fundamentalist Christian arguments for a great flood include finding fish fossils in mountains, and allegedly
    2 KB (393 words) - 10:31, 28 July 2009
  • Conservapedia
    ...rth creationism]] point of view. Conservapedia presents [[evolution]] as a scientific theory lacking support. Conservapedia's articles state that all kangaroos d [[category:theist arguments]]
    1 KB (200 words) - 09:19, 16 April 2010
  • Magic
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    1,012 B (148 words) - 05:56, 28 January 2008
  • Intelligent Design
    ... claimed to be scientific or made to appear scientific but is not actually scientific). "Intelligent design" originated in response to the 1987 United States Sup ==Intelligent Design In The Scientific Community==
    3 KB (359 words) - 05:39, 21 February 2008
  • Museums and religion
    ... and the whale is historically (or scientifically) accurate. Is there any scientific evidence to suggest a human being could survive three days inside the stoma [[category:scientific arguments]]
    1 KB (228 words) - 19:53, 9 June 2008
  • Freezer
    Chapter Five - The Scientific Evidence ...it points to or not. In doing so, the Jesus Seminar is simply applying the scientific method to the evidence for Jesus. And the conclusions they come to are deri
    65 KB (11,280 words) - 01:32, 7 February 2008
  • Grant R. Jeffrey
    ...nd of the world themes, satan and promotion of creationism by bastardizing scientific facts. ...Louisiana (while Jeffrey is from Canada). Also his degrees are not in any scientific field, but instead, “biblical studies”. There’s no indication that t
    2 KB (279 words) - 15:50, 9 June 2008
  • A War On Science
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    377 B (44 words) - 17:08, 11 February 2008
  • Jesus loves the little zygotes
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    1 KB (227 words) - 18:29, 20 July 2009
  • Stupid design
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    701 B (111 words) - 03:15, 21 October 2008
  • Richard Dawkins Q&A
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    774 B (100 words) - 16:34, 17 March 2008
  • The atheist delusion
    "The Atheist Delusion" calls poignant attention to standard Christian arguments: ...dle away as knowledge continues to increase. In the 19th century, when the scientific and industrial revolutions were changing society very quickly, this may not
    26 KB (4,352 words) - 19:35, 30 April 2008
  • Bible time
    Nowadays, most respected scientists and others in the scientific and historical community use a different nomenclature when referring to anc [[category:historical arguments]]
    1 KB (261 words) - 22:32, 19 March 2008
  • Myers vs Simmons
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (265 words) - 04:29, 21 March 2008
  • Creationist museum tour
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theist arguments]]
    2 KB (274 words) - 05:31, 23 January 2009
  • An atheist's call to arms
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    2 KB (305 words) - 20:43, 24 March 2008
  • James Randi
    [[category:theological arguments|Randi]] [[category:scientific arguments|Randi]]
    882 B (126 words) - 22:35, 15 February 2009
  • The Four Horsemen
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    905 B (105 words) - 15:59, 17 April 2008
  • Recommended books
    ...ector of the Center for Cognitive Studies at Tufts University, calls for a scientific, rational examination of religion that will lead us to understand what purp [[category:theological arguments]]
    4 KB (585 words) - 17:19, 12 October 2009
  • Undercover atheist
    Fortenberry then started in on a rant against science and against scientific explanations for cycles of sin. "Take homosexuals," he said. "Every single [[category:theological arguments]]
    44 KB (7,812 words) - 17:04, 28 June 2011
  • Atheism FAQ
    ... has been a major factor in oppression of women and minorities, curtailing scientific progress, engaging in war, and much more. If it was merely a personal beli ...ims made that supposedly "prove God exists". Instead, check the [[Top ten arguments for the existence of God]] page, which probably has what you're about to sa
    30 KB (4,966 words) - 06:48, 20 November 2012
  • The Case For Christ
    ...orical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), an ... for Christ has strengthened their faith in his divinity. Whatever counter-arguments are presented in the book seem to have been included merely to make the boo
    35 KB (5,903 words) - 16:28, 31 May 2010
  • Lee Strobel
    ...orical evidence (for example, "Can the Biographies of Jesus Be Trusted?"), scientific evidence, ("Does Archeology Confirm or Contradict Jesus' Biographies?"), an ... for Christ has strengthened their faith in his divinity. Whatever counter-arguments are presented in the book seem to have been included merely to make the boo
    17 KB (2,795 words) - 08:30, 12 March 2011
  • Where did religion come from?
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    420 B (51 words) - 16:12, 20 May 2008
  • Incompatible properties
    ...hat most of these use Judeo-Christian scripture as as examples but similar arguments could be made for many other religions): [[category:theological arguments]]
    4 KB (571 words) - 14:40, 3 July 2011
  • How to disagree
    ...gent design in such a cavalier fashion. Intelligent design is a legitimate scientific theory.}} .... In particular, it will help them to see through intellectually dishonest arguments. An eloquent speaker or writer can give the impression of vanquishing an op
    9 KB (1,517 words) - 23:39, 24 May 2008
  • Secular charities
    ... blog on religious freedom issues, action alerts, and in-depth articles on scientific, religious, and legal issues of the day. :Provides several arguments for the case against private school vouchers.
    20 KB (2,834 words) - 11:57, 8 October 2016
  • Why do people believe weird things?
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    1 KB (194 words) - 04:15, 15 January 2009
  • Atheist experience
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    3 KB (372 words) - 15:32, 18 June 2008
  • How to piss off an atheist
    11) Bring up arguments that make no sense whatsoever; criticize their response with "You're just n 14) Post inane arguments on the Internet, and never follow up on them.
    25 KB (4,113 words) - 02:56, 20 December 2010
  • The Secret
    ...very badly constructed arguments, category errors, logical fallacies etc.. scientific seeming images that then never go anywhere to strengthen it's points, and e And the matter-of-fact "scientific proof" is alluded to by various graphics, impressive looking images of expe
    59 KB (10,024 words) - 17:11, 12 November 2010
  • Sam Harris - Common sense is a good thing
    [[category:philosophical arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    475 B (59 words) - 03:24, 22 July 2008
  • Sam Harris vs Rabbi David Wolpe
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:historical arguments]]
    4 KB (623 words) - 03:35, 22 July 2008
  • Jefferson Bible
    ...time regarded deism as an ill-conceived attempt to reconcile religion with scientific discoveries. For rationalists in the Age of Enlightenment, deism was one of [[category:scriptural arguments]]
    6 KB (987 words) - 23:50, 25 July 2008
  • Origin of the universe
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    555 B (73 words) - 04:32, 28 July 2008
  • 10 questions every intelligent christian must answer
    [[category:philosophical arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    146 B (14 words) - 03:29, 8 August 2008
  • Misconceptions about atheists
    ...t the world & universe around them, but they do not "worship" science. The scientific process is simply a way to determine what's most likely true and what's not ...cting experiments to try to disprove God exists. It's just that in all our scientific discovery, no trace of any gods has been found.
    12 KB (2,100 words) - 16:06, 23 August 2009
  • Scientists and atheism
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    6 KB (851 words) - 16:16, 23 February 2010
  • Pareidolia
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    745 B (105 words) - 20:02, 23 June 2009
  • Bogosity
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    1 KB (162 words) - 19:46, 25 August 2008
  • Axioms
    This book appears to be a philosophical commentary which masquerades as being scientific in nature, but ultimately is a re-hash of various Christian apologetic prin [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    3 KB (372 words) - 19:06, 26 August 2008
  • Evolution effects
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    13 KB (2,114 words) - 19:46, 10 September 2008
  • Kent Hovind vs. Michael Shermer
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    378 B (42 words) - 16:37, 28 October 2008
  • Amusing Christian rituals
    ...ff. Saw how pompous and silly it was, how ignorant it was of the beauty of scientific thought, how it seeks to preserve things exactly how they "were" without a [[category:historical arguments]]
    8 KB (1,498 words) - 21:42, 19 December 2010
  • Fire walking
    ...ou can have a protective force field around you. Unfortunately, there are scientific principals which explain how firewalking works, and when it won't work, no [[category:scientific arguments]]
    744 B (101 words) - 16:13, 20 November 2008
  • Catholics destroyed the mayan language
    ... of the Maya hieroglyphs as "one of the great stories of twentieth century scientific discovery." Tragically, this decipherment was only necessary because of a o [[category:historical arguments]]
    4 KB (618 words) - 03:05, 15 January 2011
  • God belief physiology
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    4 KB (761 words) - 13:48, 6 May 2010
  • Religious Misconceptions
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:theological arguments]]
    12 KB (1,845 words) - 16:15, 17 September 2011
  • Morals And Progress
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    4 KB (645 words) - 03:50, 31 December 2008
  • Socrates vs Jesus
    A key desideratum of any scientific inquiry is parsimony, which among other things means keeping one's presuppo ...g evidence or good arguments. All they need is a hint of evidence and some arguments that sound good to people who enjoy believing that the experts don't really
    25 KB (4,251 words) - 22:20, 19 February 2012
  • Right and wrong
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:philosophical arguments]]
    348 B (49 words) - 23:33, 5 January 2009
  • Stupid theists
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (248 words) - 19:28, 8 January 2009
  • American religion statistics
    [[category:scientific arguments]] [[category:historical arguments]]
    20 KB (2,985 words) - 21:42, 19 December 2010
  • Harvard prayer experiment
    The [[Harvard prayer experiment]] was a scientific study to qualify and quantity the effects (if any) of prayer to affect peop [[category:scientific arguments]]
    9 KB (1,414 words) - 21:46, 19 December 2010
  • History of murder
    [[category:historical arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (284 words) - 07:02, 5 February 2010
  • Richard Dawkins in Lynchburg VA
    [[category:theological arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    725 B (84 words) - 15:57, 10 July 2009
  • Johnny Bradford's deconversion
    ...moved away from biblical inerrancies and theological issues toward seeking scientific rational explanations for the world. The theory of god cannot be disproved, [[category:theological arguments]]
    10 KB (1,795 words) - 19:54, 21 March 2010
  • Metric system
    [[category:scientific arguments]]
    935 B (143 words) - 18:27, 9 March 2009
  • Ronald Reagan
    ...filed suit against the EPA [and] charged that the agency was suppressing a scientific study for fear it might be misinterpreted... The suppressed study reveals t [[category:historical arguments]]
    39 KB (6,370 words) - 14:44, 12 August 2019
  • Argument from silence
    For more on evidential arguments from silence: http://www.umass.edu/wsp/methodology/outline/silence.html [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (336 words) - 00:34, 13 April 2009
  • Magdalen papyrus
    [[category:historical arguments]] [[category:scientific arguments]]
    2 KB (244 words) - 18:53, 24 May 2009
  • Master list of logical fallacies
    ...uments that support your position, but ignoring or somehow disallowing the arguments against. ...hools." (But why can't we do some of both?) Similarly, "We should take the scientific research budget and use it to feed starving children."
    49 KB (8,140 words) - 18:21, 9 February 2012
  • Pop quiz
    ...mpire and became a period in human history marked by a virtual collapse in scientific advancement and improvement of the human condition, in favor of rampant dis [[category:theological arguments]]
    2 KB (355 words) - 21:00, 9 July 2009
  • Snippets
    ...-paste to address arguments. Many religious apologists use the same tired arguments over and over. That's no reason for you to waste too much time addressing ... to everything important in our world and denying well reasoned, testable, scientific discoveries and advancements until forced, after decades, centuries even mi
    29 KB (4,850 words) - 14:53, 13 December 2011
  • Die zehn besten Argumente für die Existenz Gottes
    ...tierende eine Ursache haben muss, wer hat Grott kreiert? Varianten dieses Arguments berufen sich auf den ersten Hauptsatz der Thermodynamik um zu behaupten, da ...Argument ignores huge amounts of contradictory evidence, as do many of the arguments herein.
    26 KB (4,092 words) - 10:10, 5 February 2010
  • Anne Druyan
    [[category:scientific arguments|Druyan]]
    314 B (43 words) - 17:27, 2 December 2009
  • 50 reasons why i reject evolution
    ...ause when confronted with that, I refuse to believe it. It’s obviously a scientific conspiracy aimed at turning everyone on the planet into atheists... even th ...Social Darwinism has nothing to do with evolution and is actually a pseudo-scientific bastardization that real science largely rejects.
    9 KB (1,410 words) - 00:53, 9 March 2009
  • St. Thomas Aquinas Five Ways
    The key to fooling people with these arguments is simple: insert a naked assertion in the middle of the argument, hoping t ...s a special pleading, an exception to the rules in each of the first three arguments: Acquinas simply says, "God did it" and declares that's where his logic end
    12 KB (2,054 words) - 17:42, 24 February 2010
  • Moon Hoax
    Questioning man's way to the Moon is almost an absolute taboo in scientific circles.<ref name="Folha">[http://folha.com.br/ci595652 Céticos ainda tent *'''Abduldaem Al-Kaheel''', Syrian mechanical engineer, researcher in the Scientific Miracles of the Qur'an and Sunnah, author of forty books, and "Kaheel7" sit
    139 KB (21,438 words) - 10:10, 15 September 2010
  • Evidence the Jews were slaves in Egypt
    Among the scientific community, this is not a contested issue; even conservative Jewish sources [[category:scientific arguments]]
    3 KB (483 words) - 18:18, 2 February 2016

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://w.freethoughtpedia.org/wiki/Special:Search"

This site costs a lot of money in bandwidth and resources. We are glad to bring it to you free, but would you consider helping support our site by making a donation? Any amount would go a long way towards helping us continue to provide this useful service to the community.

Click on the Paypal button below to donate. Your support is most appreciated!

Views
Personal tools
Partner Sites
Support Freethoughtpedia.com

Online Shop
Toolbox