Would you like to add or edit content here? Here's how you can have an account!



Search results

From FreeThoughtPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  • ... is. When all the evidence is carefully and thoroughly studied by the best scientific methods, it turns out that these fossils were either from monkeys, apes, or ...on as "intellectual fraud" because it is a religious world view cloaked in scientific terminology.
    4 KB (672 words) - 13:07, 3 June 2008
  • ...any innocent readers the impression that scientists in droves were finding scientific "evidence" allowing for God and an afterlife and were jumping on the religi [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    18 KB (2,481 words) - 17:12, 9 February 2009
  • ...ty runs in Christianity can be gauged by one of the most popular Christian arguments for belief in God: Pascal’s wager. This "wager" holds that it’s safer t ===8. Christianity is anti-intellectual, anti-scientific.===
    52 KB (8,484 words) - 02:00, 24 November 2010
  • ...cience, for this doctrine can always take refuge in those domains in which scientific knowledge has not yet been able to set foot. But I am convinced that such b ...ns for the role of God in the affairs of the universe. With the success of scientific theories in describing events, most people have come to believe that God al
    37 KB (6,424 words) - 01:55, 24 November 2010
  • ... Christian notion of "free will". Let's now examine free will from a more scientific/philosophical perspective. I am doing this because I think there's a stron There is overwhelming scientific evidence of non-chance, non-arbitrary decision making in human brains. We
    16 KB (2,788 words) - 01:32, 12 March 2011
  • [[Category:scientific arguments]] [[Category:theological arguments]]
    4 KB (605 words) - 18:05, 9 September 2007
  • ... to take his own pulse, the consummate gesture of a creature of the age of scientific rationalism. [[Category:historical arguments]]
    17 KB (2,939 words) - 11:31, 8 August 2008
  • [[Category:theological arguments]] ..., because science disproves their parents' religion - leading to appalling scientific illiteracy.
    13 KB (2,096 words) - 23:17, 14 June 2009
  • ...ments being presented. I would often scoff at Mithra and Krishna and Horus arguments. Most atheists seemed to push them as direct corollaries when they definite [[Category:theological arguments]]
    10 KB (1,755 words) - 23:57, 23 June 2009
  • ...culation about the nature of things outside the universe, with no room for scientific verification. Attempting to explain something outside this universe with th [[Category:theological arguments]]
    2 KB (413 words) - 08:50, 25 April 2009
  • ...iable "alternative" to existing theories that have held up to centuries of scientific scrutiny, but instead because of an implication that these faith-based idea A good scientific backdrop to the discussion might be Dr. Meyer's book that comes out in June
    10 KB (1,719 words) - 21:41, 19 December 2010
  • ...sion is the term atheists use to describe the self-discovery of natural or scientific thinking about the nature of the universe. For most people, the process is [[category:theological arguments]]
    1 KB (154 words) - 18:20, 20 March 2008
  • ...ved by the unaided reason and they had to set up what they considered were arguments to prove it. ...ange their character as time goes on. They were at first hard intellectual arguments embodying certain quite definite fallacies. As we come to modern times they
    34 KB (6,550 words) - 05:23, 21 December 2010
  • : by David Ulansey, originally published in Scientific American, December 1989 (vol. 261, #6), pp. 130-135. [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    35 KB (5,728 words) - 21:25, 7 February 2011
  • [[Category:Scientific arguments]] [[Category:Theological arguments]]
    5 KB (835 words) - 03:10, 19 July 2010
  • ...f more than 20 books. In his works, he advocated skeptical inquiry and the scientific method. He pioneered exobiology and promoted the Search for Extra-Terrestri [[category:scientific arguments|Sagan]]
    1 KB (166 words) - 04:17, 29 December 2010
  • [[Category:Theological arguments]] [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    974 B (122 words) - 05:44, 4 January 2009
  • If evolution is not a fact or a theory, then what is it? Based on the scientific method it qualifies as a model or a hypothesis.}} [[Category:scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (538 words) - 19:09, 8 December 2010
  • [[Category:Scientific arguments]]
    4 KB (604 words) - 17:39, 9 September 2008
  • ...-destroying missionaries, legally enforced resistance to each new piece of scientific truth until the last possible moment -- are even more impressive. And what ...has been destroyed as a reason for believing in a God. Are there any other arguments? Some people believe in God because of what appears to them to be an inner
    18 KB (3,253 words) - 19:10, 30 March 2008

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


This site costs a lot of money in bandwidth and resources. We are glad to bring it to you free, but would you consider helping support our site by making a donation? Any amount would go a long way towards helping us continue to provide this useful service to the community.

Click on the Paypal button below to donate. Your support is most appreciated!

Views
Personal tools
Partner Sites
Support Freethoughtpedia.com

Online Shop



Toolbox